Military sexual assault inflicts damage at the individual and organizational levels. For individuals, it compounds physical and emotional injury by also injuring military careers. Organizationally, sexual assault reduces unit cohesion and military effectiveness. The Department of Defense has undertaken efforts to address sexual assault by introducing personnel, procedural, and structural change. Key actors in implementing the changes are the military lawyers charged with prosecuting sexual assault cases. This study contributes to the literature by presenting an exploratory case that identifies ways by which Air Force lawyers strategize about the prosecution of sexual assault cases.
The findings revealed participants were required to engage in collective strategizing at the individual and group levels. The greatest threat to the participants’ intended strategy were internal actors. The participants’ intended strategies were planned and dependent upon legal resources, organizational values, and military justice procedures. In contrast, participants’ emergent strategies were dependent upon military justice processes and by connecting texts with other texts, discourse, and interpretations. Lastly, the participants coped paradoxically when their intended strategy was challenged.
A key contribution of this research was to take an existing paradox model and to place it in a new context, disclose the limitations of the model, and develop an improved model.
|Advisor:||Marquardt, Michael J.|
|Commitee:||Galbreath, Nathan W., Galvin, Thomas P., Hurst, Robin R., Storberg-Walker, Julia B.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Education and Human Development|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 77/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Law, Criminology, Organization Theory, Organizational behavior, Military studies|
|Keywords:||Assault, Discourse, Lawyer, Military, Sexual, Strategy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be