In an age of cost-consciousness in health care, it is essential that we seek to understand the ramifications of the choices where costs and expected clinical performance differ. When the cost differences are evolving and performance differences are not yet clearly defined, it is even more important for physicians and patients to ponder the consequences of these shared decisions. The case of bearing choice in total hip arthroplasty is the quintessential case where the ceramic-on-polyethylene choice generally costs more, but is expected to perform better by having fewer failed hip replacements that require some 10-20 years for meaningful differences to emerge.
This study demonstrated that clinical problems in ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal surfaces, once thought to be the future of hip arthroplasty, have market consequences. Significantly reduced use and decreased cost premium of these surfaces compared to the cheapest alternative, metal-on-polyethylene, was observed over the study period. Further, in a constant press to increase the bearing life in patients, the use of ceramic-on-polyethylene surfaces grew exponentially across the 2007-2012 study period even before sufficiently rigorous evidence of performance that is just now starting to emerge.
This study has revealed that costs of these bearing choices vary widely across time and contextual variables. Analysis showing that more expensive, presumed longer lasting devices were used more frequently in younger, less sick patients that have more potential life years remaining to overcome the added cost indicated that cost-effectiveness principles are often considered. Cost-effectiveness of choosing the more expensive ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surface was demonstrated to be highly dependent on patient age, implant cost difference, and level of improved performance of the ceramic-on-polyethylene implant. This study’s use of the Premier Research Database’s individual-level costs for both implants and the surgical procedure for almost 2 million patients and multiple literature sources for bearing surface performance brings new information and analysis to the question of spending more to get better results in total hip arthroplasty.
|Advisor:||Brandon, William P., Troyer, Jennifer L.|
|Commitee:||Blanchette, Christopher, Odum, Susan, Webster, Murray|
|School:||The University of North Carolina at Charlotte|
|Department:||Health Services Research|
|School Location:||United States -- North Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-B 77/10(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Economics, Health sciences|
|Keywords:||Arthroplasty, Bearing surfaces, Ceramic-on-polyethylene, Cost-effectiveness, Metal-on-polyethylene|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be