Oddballs—low-probability, attention-capturing expectancy violations—are judged as longer than non-oddballs, but are temporal intervals that contain oddballs judged as longer than those that do not? In 2 experiments, we tested competing model predictions using a novel and covert measure of subjective duration—musical imagery reproduction. Participants verbally estimated and reproduced with musical imagery repeated, coherent, or incoherent familiar or unfamiliar chord sequences (3.5 s, 7 s, or 12 s) that either did or did not contain dynamic auditory oddballs. Participants verbally estimated repeated chord sequences that contained oddballs as shorter than those that did not, but reproduced with musical imagery incoherent chord sequences that contained oddballs as longer than those that did not. These findings suggest that (a) intervals that contain attention-capturing, high-priority events are judged as shorter than those that do not when people are engaged in relatively temporal information processing, but as longer than those that do not when people are engaged in relatively nontemporal information processing, and (b) temporal and nontemporal information processing are interdependent. These results support the resource allocation model of short interval time estimation. We discuss implications for attention- and memory-based models, dynamic attending theory, and the ongoing debate about the mechanisms driving the temporal oddball illusion.
|Advisor:||Hellmuth Margulis, Elizabeth|
|Commitee:||Behrend, Douglas A., Levine, William H., Parks, Nathan A.|
|School:||University of Arkansas|
|School Location:||United States -- Arkansas|
|Source:||MAI 55/04M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Music, Experimental psychology, Cognitive psychology|
|Keywords:||Dynamic attending theory, Information processing, Musical imagery, Resource allocation model, Temporal oddball effect, Time estimation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be