The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore perceptions of professional development structures through the perceptive lens of experienced K-12 educators. The problem addressed in the study was ineffectively planned professional development in public school systems. Two groups of educators participated in the study. Group One consisted of 28 participants from building level positions such as teachers, principals, and assistant principals. Group Two consisted of five district level administrators from area school districts each having two or more years’ experience planning professional development. Research questions included: (a) What are public school stakeholder perceptions of using logistical factors when planning for professional development activities?; (b) What are the perceptions of public school stakeholders of professional learning delivery methods that optimize professional development in schools?; (c) What factors do public school stakeholders perceive should be included when planning professional development activities?; (d) What role do stakeholders perceive school culture plays in determining the effectiveness of professional development? Findings from the study revealed planning successful PD structures should include engaging activities delivered by empathetic and knowledgeable speakers, and offer time for participant collaboration. Teachers viewed PD successfully if the topic was related to current teaching practices or content area. PD planners believed PD was related to school improvement or the “change” process. The differing perspectives were found to contribute to a much larger implication on school culture. A final outcome of the study was the development of a Professional Development Pre-Evaluation Scale, which could help PD planners improve proposed professional development offerings before implementation.
|Commitee:||Brandly, Ron, Ingmire, Mary|
|School:||Missouri Baptist University|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 77/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, School administration, Adult education|
|Keywords:||Adult learning, Adult learning structures, Educator development, Professional development structures, Staff development|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be