The purpose of this qualitative single-case study was to explore the publicly documented perceptions of the SEC regulators to determine if SOX 404 requirements have been supportive of influencing transparent financial reporting, preventing fraudulent financial statements, or misrepresentation of ICFR. A total of 15 archived, secondary, publicly available documents, representing 15 different SEC regulators’ perspectives, were retrieved from the SEC website over a research time frame of July 30, 2002 until November 1, 2010. The samples were explored to identify the common perspectives of the 15 SEC regulators’ relative to the effectiveness of SOX 404, and determine the overall perspectives of the holistic SEC entity or single case. Nvivo 8 was used to perform the data analysis and yielded 9 common themes. The findings revealed that although the SEC deemed SOX 404 supportive of influencing transparent financial reporting, preventing fraudulent financial statements, or misrepresentation of ICFR, the Commission was aware that gaps and opportunities for enhancing the law to promote its effectiveness and remove inefficiencies existed. The findings also revealed that the SEC was conscious of the issues, topics, opinions, observations and findings raised by SOX 404 critics and complying companies, and have been attentive, responsive and willing to address to those matters.
|Advisor:||Martin, Craig H.|
|Commitee:||DASGUPTA, TATHAGATA, MATHUR, NEIL|
|School:||University of Phoenix|
|Department:||School of Advanced Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 77/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Management, Finance, Banking|
|Keywords:||Compliance, Dodd-frank, Financial regulations, Internal controls, Management, Sarbanes-oxley|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be