“Positivism” is an approach to social inquiry that dominates the discipline of International Relations (IR). For positivists, this dominance is justified because positivism yields us scientific knowledge of world politics. In response, my thesis reconstructs positivism’s argument and argues that positivism fails to yield evidence at least, and scientific knowledge at most. Most fundamentally, positivism fails because our present-day concepts – such as “democracy” and the “GDP” – are too ambiguous. To remedy this, I draw a lesson from two theories in Physics and Mathematics: Primitive Recursive Arithmetic and Newtonian Kinematics. I outline their method of “Lego-languages” that we in IR can use to construct unambiguous concepts. I argue that the first step to using this method, is for IR scholars to describe their sensory experience of world politics through autoethnography, and possibly, filmmaking.
|School:||National University of Singapore (Singapore)|
|School Location:||Republic of Singapore|
|Source:||MAI 55/03M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be