Clinical utility has been offered by numerous researchers as a criterion for understanding the value of diagnostic constructs, but it does not yet have a standard operational definition or recommended forms of measurement. The construct has significant overlap with diagnostic validity and it is possible that sub-domains of clinical utility may emerge that would contribute to development of a scale which could assess for improvements and degradations following nosological revisions, and also provide opportunity for cross-analysis with alternative systems of mental health diagnosis. Therefore, the present study collected survey data from psychologists about the clinical utility of the DSM-5, using online data collection and quantitative methods. Seven questions of clinical utility were rated using a 5 point likert scale for each of the DSM-5's diagnostic categories and for the DSM-5 as an overall nosology. Descriptive data, internal consistency and inter-item correlations were analyzed so that results could help address research questions posed about the clinical utility of the DSM-5's diagnostic categories, the merits of DSM-5 when compared to DSM-IV, and additional recommendations regarding optimal measurement of the clinical utility of diagnostic constructs.
|Commitee:||Brown, Richard, Gallagher, Lawrence, Kolodinsky, Pit|
|School:||Northern Arizona University|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-B 77/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Counseling Psychology, Psychology, Clinical psychology|
|Keywords:||Clinical utility, Diagnosis, Dsm-5, Quantitative|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be