Designed as a qualitative multiple-case evaluation, this study assessed the nature of policy congruence in health care organizations by evaluating the relationship of policy implementation strategies in these organizations with policy objectives contained in legislative enactments. The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) was the conduit for this study, and research emphasis focused on how PACE programs attempt to implement policy objectives engrossed in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), even when not specifically required to do so. The problem identified has been that questions of policy consistency with the ACA continue to permeate the discussions surrounding PACE, and its utility as an alternative elder care initiative as contrasted against those concepts promoted in the ACA. The purpose of this research project was to advance theory and the application of theory in policy analysis. No review of PACE had been conducted through a theoretical perspective, and the theories of public choice and new institutionalism served as the theoretical framework which guided this study. Phone interviews of twelve PACE managers were conducted to ascertain organizational response to policies promoted in the ACA. Observational research was conducted at three PACE locations where high levels of policy congruence with the ACA were detected. This was complemented with public record document review which served to triangulate the research project. The study’s key finding is that uncertainty in markets where PACE is located has led most PACE programs to reflect characteristics of mimetic isomorphism. Furthermore, the ACA can be seen as subtly coercive in that regard, whereby PACE managers migrate PACE towards policies promoted in the ACA, and attempt to attain institutional legitimacy through mimetic behavior, which leads to more homogenous health care organizations. This study confirms the utility of public choice theory and new institutional theory in the investigation of public policy, and organizational strategies associated with public policy implementation. Evaluating PACE through public choice and new institutional theory expands the understanding of these theories, and their applicability and utility in evaluating the linkage between the policy theory, promulgation, and implementation processes, and thus, consequent effective governance strategies.
|Commitee:||Jacobs, Jimmie, Piferi, Rachel|
|Department:||Business and Technology Management|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-B 77/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Political science, Public administration, Health care management|
|Keywords:||Affordable care act, Health care, New institutional, Policy science, Public choice, Public policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be