Response to Intervention (RtI) is a prevention-oriented approach to helping all students succeed academically. It is a framework that, when applied properly, influences all decision-making within a school building and/or district. Currently, most American school districts report using an RtI framework. Specifics regarding implementation, however, are unknown at this time. Given that RtI is a systems-wide approach which is philosophically disparate from traditional ways of viewing students struggling academically, it has the potential to shift traditional school psychological roles. Our knowledge regarding the degree to which RtI has changed school psychologists’ practices is incomplete at this time. Additionally, there is extremely limited information regarding school psychologists’ self-efficacy for RtI-related tasks, yet the literature highlights that school psychologists should be prepared to take an active role in RtI implementation efforts. The current study attempted to a gain a broader understanding of current RtI implementation, by surveying a national sample of 392 school psychologists working in elementary school buildings. The results suggest that most schools are using an RtI framework, but are still in the beginning stages of implementation. A large percentage of participants (33–50%) were unable to identify whether the foundational components of RtI were in use. School psychologists described RtI as an effective method to help students succeed academically. They also reported being more often involved in data-based decision making activities within an RtI framework, as opposed to data-gathering activities. Furthermore, respondents indicated RtI was related to a decrease in assessment-related school psychological activities and an increase in intervention and consultation-related tasks. Most school psychologists reported that they are either not involved in RtI program evaluation and/or there was no program evaluation in their schools. Those surveyed perceived administrators as more heavily invested in teacher evaluation processes than in RtI processes currently. Most participants reported moderate-to-high levels of self-efficacy for all school psychological practices, including RtI-related tasks. Respondents also delineated those things that are likely to both facilitate and impede RtI implementation. The findings from this study have implications for university trainers; educational professionals; and, school psychologists.
|Commitee:||Quinn, Kevin, Solomon, Benjamin|
|School:||State University of New York at Albany|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-B 77/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational psychology, Psychology|
|Keywords:||Education, Response to intervention, School psychology, Self-efficacy, Service delivery|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be