The shift to obligate bipedality entailed numerous morphological changes, including major reorganization of the ribcage, vertebral column, and pelvis, and additional changes in the trunk reflect climatic, obstetric, and energetic demands. What remains unexplored is how this complex suite of selective pressures influenced the degree to which these elements relate and track one another—the pattern of morphological integration.
Here I focus on morphological relationships within the trunk skeleton—the ribcage, vertebral column, and pelvis—to provide new insights into the evolution of body form. In hominins, the bipedal locomotor need for trunk stability, the obstetrical pressures that influence pelvic morphology, and the ecogeographic pressures that affect core body shape combine to create a complex series of interactions on trunk form. Examining the extent to which the skeletal regions of the trunk covary has the potential to provide information about how the combined and potentially competitive effects of multiple selective pressures influence the evolution of anatomical complexes.
This project confirmed untested assumptions about strong trunk integration in chimpanzees while demonstrating that trunk integration in humans is weaker. The more weakly integrated human trunk is accompanied by only minor differences in the patterns of phenotypic covariation among thorax, spinal, and pelvic elements relative to chimpanzees, contrary to expectations that bipedality may have caused a drastic reorganization of such patterns.
The results support the idea that the chimpanzee trunk skeleton responds as more of a unit to selection than does the trunk of recent humans. In humans, trunk integration is weaker, and what integration there is seems to be driven mainly by rough correspondence in breadths, which relates well to climatic variables, particularly minimum annual temperature. The relatively stronger integration of the true pelvis in humans compared to chimpanzees, and in human females compared to males, suggests that the novel pattern of integration of the os coxa related to the adoption of bipedalism facilitated later adaptations to difficult obstetrics in the genus Homo.
This project also reinforced support for strong correlations of bi-iliac breadth with latitude in Old World populations of recent humans but demonstrated that New World populations do not follow this trend, and suggests that the retention of wider body forms in the New World relates to a combination of reduced evolutionary flexibility from colonization coupled with relaxed thermoregulatory selection on body breadth in non-cold environments. Overall, the results suggest that ecogeographic effects, in the form of novel climatic selective pressures and neutral genetic evolution, reduce trunk modularity in recent humans.
As a whole, these results contribute to our growing understanding of the selective trade-offs and integration of the hominin trunk skeleton while affirming the utility of a comparative approach focused on investigating phenotypic covariation across a large skeletal region to address questions of evolutionary change. On this basis further inquiry into other hominoid and ecogeographically-diverse taxa are warranted. The results of this project lay the foundation for consideration of phenotypic integration of skeletal and soft tissue morphology, which will refine our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the evolution of body form.
|Advisor:||Anton, Susan C.|
|Commitee:||Harrison, Terry, Jolly, Clifford J., Ward, Carol V., Williams, Scott A.|
|School:||New York University|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 77/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Climate, Evolution of body form, Homo sapiens, Morphological integration, Pelvis, Thorax|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be