This dissertation presents an argument for using a framework of rhetorical teaching to re-invigorate invention pedagogy in First-Year Composition (FYC) courses. Rhetorical invention (the ability to imagine or create ways to write) pedagogy is discussed in the context of composition history to analyze how scholars have proposed, developed, and implemented invention-focused pedagogies. This dissertation argues that often, these pedagogies are subverted into a form of current-traditional pedagogy because the social and material conditions of the educational system de facto encourage teachers to simplify and otherwise reductively present invention to gain time and mental energy efficiency.
This analysis culminates in the presentation of a pedagogical framework called rhetorical teaching that calls for teachers to see students as stakeholders in the educational process. The students are recognized as having expectations and desires that may not align perfectly with the teacher's expectations. The teacher then anticipates these desires and expectations to alter activities in ways that respect students, while also fulfilling the teacher's goals and the institutional goals. The framework of rhetorical teaching is explained in detail through the analysis of an in-class daily writing activity called the Daily Argument (DA). The DA is a 5-minute writing activity that uses minimal-context prompts that give the student only a topic, rather than a structured response prompt, in order to encourage the student to frame the topic and the argument made. This allows instructors to more carefully gauge the student's projection of the rhetorical situation, along with the ways that the student invents writing to address that situation. Finally, this dissertation discusses considerations and suggestions for fostering invention pedagogy on the institutional level through curriculum planning, teacher training, and assessment procedures.
Some files may require a special program or browser plug-in. More Information
|Advisor:||Olson, Wendy M.|
|Commitee:||Condon, William, Villanueva, Victor|
|School:||Washington State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Washington|
|Source:||DAI-A 76/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Composition, Current-traditional, Invention, Rhetoric|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be