Although first recognized as an equivalent to individual supervision in the 2001 standards of The Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP), to date it still remains the case that very little research has been done on this unique and increasingly popular supervision modality. Despite being utilized in counselor education programs across the county, as of the spring of 2015, only seven dissertations and 13 empirical journal articles have been written addressing triadic supervision specifically. With this being the case, relatively little is known about the various processes that underlie the triadic supervision process or about best practices to increase its effectiveness.
The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore and gain a better understanding of supervisors’ perceptions, experiences and practices with regards to triadic supervision. Data was collected by way of in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted either via phone or via Skype. Of the 23 supervisors who participated in this study, all had conducted triadic supervision within the last 5 years and all were either graduates of, currently enrolled doctoral students in or faculty members at CACREP accredited programs. Data was analyzed using basic interpretive qualitative techniques, where more specifically the seven-step analysis plan detailed by Marshall and Rossman (2006) was utilized.
The initial fourteen themes that emerged from the data analysis process were further synthesized into eight primary findings. These findings addressed the three primary research questions of this study: (a) How do supervisors go about structuring their triadic supervision sessions and what is the thought process behind this decision? (b) What are supervisors’ thoughts on the role and influence of the second supervisee in session and on the supervisory process? (c) What specific aspects of triadic supervision impact supervisors’ behavior and decision-making throughout the course of the supervisory process? Implications for counselor preparation and practices were discussed, where specific and separate recommendations were given for both Counselor Education programs and for supervisors. Recommendations for future research were also discussed.
Some files may require a special program or browser plug-in. More Information
|Commitee:||Howard, Lionel, Marmarosh, Cheri, Megivern, Monica, Miller, Janet, Windham, Craig|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 76/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Clinical supervision, Counseling, Counselor education, Supervision, Triadic supervision|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be