Determining natural inner knee mechanics is a longstanding goal for researchers with applications to prevention and treatment of knee trauma and osteoarthritis. Physical testing has only provided limited information of knee mechanics due to technical challenges and cost. Modeling has been used for decades to obtain some of this otherwise inaccessible information, and recently finite element analysis (FEA) has become a popular means to this end. However, FEA requires time intensive mesh-creation and has large computational requirements. Ideally, model creation should be easy and simulations should be fast to allow for sensitivity analysis. Although allowing easier model creation and offering over an order of magnitude more computational efficiency than FEA, current rigid body modeling of the knee is limited by imprecise methodologies for defining material properties. Cartilage and meniscus are particular points of weakness.
The following thesis develops an improved methodology for cartilage contact which is user-friendly and allows for precise definition of contact via user-supplied material properties while accounting for changes in stiffness due to discretization. Additionally, meniscus modeling is improved by developing and implementing equations which directly define stress-strain relationships to match values reported in literature or those selected by the user. Results from two implemented knee models are compared to experimental results in literature and sensitivity to material properties and driving kinematics is investigated.
|Advisor:||Gonzalez, Roger V.|
|Commitee:||Guess, Trent M., Hausselle, Jerome|
|School:||The University of Texas at El Paso|
|School Location:||United States -- Texas|
|Source:||MAI 54/06M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Biomedical engineering, Biomechanics|
|Keywords:||ADAMS, Cartilage, Knee, Meniscus, Modeling, Rigid-body|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be