With PQDT Open, you can read the full text of open access dissertations and theses free of charge.
About PQDT Open
Search
This research investigated possible effects of communicator gender on rape-supportive attitude change, as well as on quality ratings of the message and credibility ratings of the communication source, in response to a sexual violence prevention speech. In a preliminary session, participants were assessed on three rape-supportive attitudes: rape myth acceptance, hostile sexism, and benevolent sexism. One week later, participants were presented with a written sexual violence prevention message featuring either a male or female source, of either high or low status, in the byline. Among our main hypotheses, we expected more of a decrease in the three rape-supportive attitudes, as well as higher source-credibility ratings and speech-quality-ratings, when the source was identified as male, in particular, a high-status male. We also examined participant gender, and reported endorsement of rape-supportive attitudes at the outset, as possible moderator variables.
Overall, we found significant decreases in rape-supportive attitudes regardless of source gender. Furthermore, source-credibility ratings and speech-quality ratings were independent of the portrayed gender of the source. Thus, despite suggestions to the contrary, both men and women may be equally effective in changing rape-supportive attitudes among both male and female audiences.
Advisor: | Brown, Amy L. |
Commitee: | Perkins, David R., Yang, Yang |
School: | University of Louisiana at Lafayette |
Department: | Psychology |
School Location: | United States -- Louisiana |
Source: | MAI 54/06M(E), Masters Abstracts International |
Source Type: | DISSERTATION |
Subjects: | Social psychology, Womens studies, Communication |
Keywords: | Communication, Gender, Persuasion, Sexual violence prevention |
Publication Number: | 1594315 |
ISBN: | 978-1-321-91360-6 |