Despite years of research work, many aspects of the fundamentally important GroEL functional cycle are still in dispute. The work of this dissertation mainly focuses on three major disputes in the field: the identity of the rate determining step (RDS), the physiological order of arrival of ligands (ATP, SP and GroES) to the GroEL trans ring, and the role of the symmetric GroEL-GroES 2 "football" complex in the overall chaperonin cycle. With multiple carefully designed spectroscopic probes, a pre-steady state survey has been conducted on the kinetics of the GroEL functional cycle. From the survey, a two cycle model emerges: in the absence of SP, ADP release is the RDS of the asymmetric cycle and consequently, the asymmetric GroEL-GroES1 ,"bullet" which precedes this step, is the pre-dominant species. In this mode, the machine turns over very slowly, minimizing futile ATP consumption. Due to the slow release of ADP, the system turns over in a well defined manner with the two rings operating 180° out of phase of each other, analogous to a two-stroke motor. In the symmetric cycle, which operates in the presence of SP, the release of ADP is greatly accelerated while the intrinsic ATPase activity of GroEL remains unaffected. Consequently ATP hydrolysis becomes the RDS and the symmetric GroEL-GroES2 "football" becomes the predominant species. Contrary to previous chaperonin dogma, the symmetric complex is a highly dynamic species exchanging its two bound ligands, GroES and encapsulated SP from both rings with a half time ~1sec. Switching to a parallel processing machine, the chaperonins turns over rapidly, ultimately driven by stochastic hydrolysis of ATP which causes the symmetric complex to undergo breakage of symmetry (BoS). With such a dynamic system, folding in the 'folding cage' seems less important in GroEL-mediated SP refolding as suggested by the passive refolding model. Instead, GroEL may play a more active role in achieving its central biological function as indicated by this two cycle model. This may be the very reason why employing even as low as one GroEL ring per ten SP can achieve SP refolding to a similar extent as using a stoichiometric amount.
|Advisor:||Lorimer, George H.|
|Commitee:||Beckett, Dorothy, Julin, Douglas, LaRonde, Nicole, Winkler, Wade|
|School:||University of Maryland, College Park|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-B 76/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Allostery, Breakage of symmetry, Functional cycle, GroEL, Protein folding, Symmetric complex|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be