Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Heidegger and disclosive rhetoric: Two divergent paths in immanence and transcendence
by Arntson, Jay D., M.A., California State University, Long Beach, 2015, 115; 1583219
Abstract (Summary)

Martin Heidegger is a key philosophical thinker who has influenced contemporary scholarship in rhetorical theory. His concept of disclosure has become particularly significant because it is uniquely situated to explain the nuances of contemporary public political address. Yet the meaning and applicability of Heidegger's rhetoric of disclosure to explain new forms of political speech have been contested by two contemporary philosophers, Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze, who advance different interpretations of the nature of a rhetoric of disclosure--one highlighting rhetoric as immanence, the other transcendence. This thesis, then, examines the philosophical and rhetorical debate about the rhetoric of disclosure by focusing on Derrida's transcendent interpretation and Deleuze's immanent interpretation in an effort to clarify Heidegger's rhetoric of disclosure and its usefulness for rhetorical studies. These divergent perspectives will then be applied to the political case study of President Barack Obama's "A More Perfect Union" speech to assess how each contributes to our understanding of rhetorical theory and criticism.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Downey, Sharon
Commitee: Fox, Ragan, Smith, Craig
School: California State University, Long Beach
Department: Communication Studies
School Location: United States -- California
Source: MAI 54/03M(E), Masters Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Philosophy, Communication, Rhetoric
Keywords: Deleuze, Gilles, Derrida, Jacques, Heidegger, Immanence, Obama, Barack, Transcendence
Publication Number: 1583219
ISBN: 9781321538175
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest