As they strive to influence the selection and adoption of public policies, the individuals most active within a given policy area ("policy actors") display a variety of behaviors. These behaviors include utilizing policy-related information, engaging in political activities, and interacting with other actors to realize their policy goals. Beliefs and resources offer two different rationales for explaining policy actor behavior. To influence policy, actors utilize resources in an attempt to sway decision makers, influence public opinion, recruit allies, or attract additional resources. Beliefs are considered to be a primary factor affecting behavior, with actors seeking out others with similar beliefs and then sharing resources and engaging in political activities to realize their policy preferences. This dissertation utilizes three theoretical frameworks, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), and Policy Analytical Capacity (PAC), to develop an improved understanding of the comparative effects of resources and beliefs on behavior. These frameworks are used as theoretical lenses to conduct a detailed study of the Colorado climate and energy policy subsystem. This dissertation offers a collection of contributions to the existing policy process literature. Methodological contributions include a new approach for understanding political landscapes that places a greater focus on the role of resources and political activities, and a collection of best practices for using hyperlink networks to study policy actors online. In addition, the dissertation provides important theoretical contributions to the three theoretical frameworks. Contributions to the ACF include developing the framework's theory about the interactions and effects of resources, extreme beliefs, and political activities. Contributions to PAC include relating capacity to political activities, while contributions to the RDT framework include relating organizational resource dependence to friend and foe interactions. Finally, this dissertation furthers the collective knowledge on climate politics and policy by expanding our understanding of the beliefs, policy preferences, information sources, political activities, and the interactions of climate policy supporters and opponents.
|Advisor:||Weible, Christopher M.|
|Commitee:||Heikkila, Tanya, Howlett, Michael, Teske, Paul|
|School:||University of Colorado at Denver|
|School Location:||United States -- Colorado|
|Source:||DAI-A 76/04(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Climate Change, Public policy, Energy|
|Keywords:||Advocacy coalition framework, Climate change, Energy policy, Policy beliefs, Policy process, Public policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be