The concept, countertransference, has followed the history of transference, being first thought to be an obstacle, then a necessary nuisance, and finally, a potential source of great therapeutic gain. During this history, the related concepts of empathy, attunement, and mutual regression have been studied and have shed some light on the experience of countertransference. However, due to the unconscious nature of these concepts, especially with regards to mutual regression, the psychoanalytic and psychodynamic theories have led to a fuller understanding of these dynamics and, ultimately, countertransference itself. Thus, the two-person psychology was born. From the two-person psychology perspective, the therapeutic dyad is conceptualized from six possible experiences: the client's experience of self, the client's experience of other (therapist), the client's experience of the relationship (client-therapist), the therapist's experience of self, the therapist's experience of other (client), and the therapist's experience of the relationship (client-therapist).
This study proposed, sought, and found ample evidence for the proposition that countertransference, and its related dynamics, can be better understood and leveraged to contribute to an increase in therapeutic gains. Each of the validity judges agreed that countertransference is a dynamic underutilized by therapists. The intersubjective view had a more egalitarian approach than the object relational or modern analytical theorists posited, resulting in the intersubjective approach being less defined but more open with regards to conceptualizing the psychodynamics of their clients. All validity judges agreed that the knowledge a therapist has of his or her countertransference includes not only an intellectual awareness but an emotional awareness and a physical/somatic awareness as well. In addition to this, each of the validity judges believed that the awareness of countertransference alone is useless without the therapist's ability to make skillful use of this awareness in a way that is effective for the client.
|Advisor:||Griffith, Nathan M.|
|Commitee:||Futerman, Joseph L.|
|School:||The Chicago School of Professional Psychology|
|Department:||Applied Clinical Psychology: Psychodynamic Psychology Concentration|
|School Location:||United States -- Illinois|
|Source:||DAI-B 76/03(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Attunement, Countertransference, Empathy, Mutual regression, Projective identification, Transference|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be