Trait self-silencing (Jack, 1991) is consistently associated with depression and relationship dissatisfaction (Harper & Welsh, 2007). Individuals who self-silence lose their identity in relationships, resulting in a loss of intimacy (Jordan, 2010). Existing research on self-silencing focuses on aggregate measures of self-silencing. We examined self-silencing using a daily diary methodology, enabling us to study both the daily effects of trait self-silencing and the consequences of daily instances of self-silencing. We predicted that mindfulness, defined as nonjudgmental present moment awareness (Bishop et al., 2004), would buffer individuals from the negative effects of trait and daily self-silencing. We also examined romantic partners' perceptions of participants' trait self-silencing. Sixty-seven undergraduate students and 60 of their partners participated in the study. We found that trait self-silencing predicted relationship conflict, relationship dissatisfaction, negative affect, and daily self-silencing. Furthermore, trait self-silencing moderated the relationship between daily self-silencing and negative affect while the self-silencing subscale moderated the relationship between daily self-silencing and daily relationship satisfaction. Daily self-silencing was more harmful when individuals were high in trait self-silencing. We also found that mindfulness moderated the relationship between trait self-silencing and measures of relationship satisfaction and depression. We argue that mindful self-silencing may not be associated with the same negative consequences as trait self-silencing. Individuals who are nonjudgmental and aware may be able to self-silence more strategically and effectively, without negative outcomes on their relationship satisfaction and their mood. This is consistent with research indicating that mindfulness is associated with more effective emotion regulation (Corcoran, Farb, Anderson, & Segal, 2010) and communication patterns in relationships (Barnes et al., 2007). Silencing the self, when accomplished with an attitude of acceptance and awareness, may not be harmful.
|Advisor:||Gunthert, Kathleen C.|
|Commitee:||Gray, James J., Herr, Nate R., Wake, Anne P.|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 76/01(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social psychology, Counseling Psychology, Clinical psychology, Cognitive psychology|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be