Category theory has been advocated as a replacement for set theory as the foundation for mathematics. It is claimed that as a foundation set theory is both inadequate and inappropriate. Set theory is considered inadequate because it cannot produce all of the mathematical objects of interest. Set theory is considered inappropriate because it provides a poor framework for mathematical research. In this dissertation, I argue that category theory is subject to exactly the same objections by considering the use of category theory for work in graph theory.
|Commitee:||Heis, Jeremy, McLarty, Colin, Weatherall, James, Wehmeier, Kai|
|School:||University of California, Irvine|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 76/01(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Category theory, Mathematical objects of interest, Poor framework, Set theory|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be