The term "capital" has been stretched and extended beyond its original theoretical roots, and this has resulted in confusion. After reviewing various problems associated with the conceptual stretching of "capital," I argue that, when used correctly with careful specification of the input-output processes, capital is a useful and necessary concept in political science. To demonstrate this, I propose three articles that focus on (1) social capital, (2) political capital in the presidency, and (3) political capital in the Supreme Court. All three articles maintain a common definition of "capital," which stems from original economic definitions; capital is "an investment with a…return in the marketplace" (Lin 2002, 3). In economics, we can think of capital as an input in production which improves the efficiency of labor. Higher amounts of capital result in higher output for the same labor input. In economics, we can differentiate between physical capital (such as machinery, buildings, vehicles, etc.) and human capital (such as education and talents of employees that aid production). We can also view social and political capital in similar ways.
Chapter II argues that sports teams, as physical social capital, can help individuals increase their stocks of social capital (human social capital) as the teams provide institutional structures that bring individuals together and decrease "social distance" between community members. Chapter III focuses on presidential political capital and demonstrates how this form of capital affects and is affected by veto usage. Results suggest that higher stocks of political capital can reverse the typically presumed costs associated with the veto. Chapter IV looks at judicial decision making and suggests that orally arguing attorneys may have higher "efficiency in labor" (or more preferred outcomes in terms of individual justices' votes with less effort) when they share collegiate affiliations with the justices. These three chapters are certainly not comprehensive of how "capital" can be used, but they provide examples of how, with proper specification, capital can be a useful concept. The conclusion draws parallels between these types of capital and various forms of capital in economics and urges scholars to incorporate the concept of "capital" into future research.
|Advisor:||Palmer, Harvey D.|
|Commitee:||Battista, James C., Duvanova, Dinissa S.|
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 75/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Capital, Civic engagement, Political capital, Social capital, Supreme court, Veto|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be