This quasi-experimental, mixed methods study analyzes the effects of the flipped classroom on the variables of a critical thinking rubric used by a Christian liberal arts college and compares these results with those of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST). Second, this dissertation examines the effects of the flipped classroom on seven sub-scales from the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI). Six professors agreed to include three different types of courses (two literature surveys, two Composition I courses, and two Theology III courses) that were matched based on course content. Experimental professors flipped at least 25% of their lessons during the study period (fall 2013). Out of 130 students, N = 97 agreed to participate; n = 97 (75.6%) were included for the critical thinking rubric, n = 62 (47.7%) were included at posttest for the CUCEI, and n = 8 (6.2%) were included at posttest for the CCTST. Of the critical thinking variables examined, Argues with reasons and evidence was significantly better (MANOVA, p < .001) in student papers from the flipped group (critical thinking rubric), and no significant differences were observed for the variables of the CCTST (p > .05). Regarding the classroom environment sub-scales, the flipped group had a better classroom environment than the controls on Innovation and Individualization (post-hoc pairwise comparisons, p < .001), whereas the control group-performed better than the flipped group on Personalization (p < .05). The sub-scale Task Orientation was similarly ideal for both groups. In conclusion, the flipped classroom model provides professors of humanities subjects more time in the classroom than traditional teaching to focus on written argumentation. Additionally, flipping the classroom engages students through an innovative, autonomous classroom environment.
|Advisor:||Coley, Kenneth S.|
|School:||Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary|
|School Location:||United States -- North Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-A 75/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Religious education, Educational technology, Higher education|
|Keywords:||Critical thinking, Flipped classroom, Higher education, Humanities, Technology integration, Theological education|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be