Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Comparing critical thinking skills of associate degree nursing students enrolled in a hybrid design versus traditional lecture
by Rose, Connie, D.N.P., Northern Kentucky University, 2014, 54; 3622608
Abstract (Summary)

Background: Approximately 25% of newly hired nurses are deficient in critical thinking skills. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine if the hybrid design course assisted nursing students to improve critical thinking skills as compared to the traditional face-to-face lecture. Methods: This quasi-experimental study utilized pre- and post-test Assessment Technologies Institute, LLC (ATI) score analyses, course grades, and a demographic survey for students in the hybrid design course and students in the traditional course. The sample size consisted of 26 students in the hybrid design course and 25 students in the traditional lecture course. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the critical thinking skills of students in the hybrid design section versus the traditional lecture section of the medical-surgical course. Course grades were statistically higher in the hybrid design course when compared to the traditional lecture section of the course.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Lancaster, Jayne K.
Commitee: Lockett, Janice, Swayne, Cheryl
School: Northern Kentucky University
Department: Nursing
School Location: United States -- Kentucky
Source: DAI-B 75/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Nursing, Health education, Higher education
Keywords: Blended learning, Critical thinking, Hybrid design, Nursing medical-surgical course, Traditional lectures
Publication Number: 3622608
ISBN: 9781303944536
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest