This study tests two interventions conducted in Afghanistan: The USSR's between 1979 and 1989, and that of the United States from 2001 to the present day. Using Paul Kennedy's hypothesis of Imperial Overstretch as a guideline, an analytical understanding of the hypothesis has been applied to locate similarities between the interventions from political and economic avenues to determine the possibility of similar long term consequences in those fields.
Research into political avenues of Imperial Overstretch focuses on dyadic treaty interaction between intervening states and other states, Data has been further analysed to locate trends in dyadic interactions on a decade by decade basis within a single country. Supporting vectors are also considered, utilizing political statements as well as polling data where available to assess external perceptions of the intervening state in each of the two cases.
Economic avenues of Imperial Overstretch have been studied in a manner related to Layla Dawood's system for assessing Imperial Overstretch; intervening states are compared to a cross section of other state militaries with an emphasis placed on the absolute amount of money spent on military avenues. Additional vectors include studying the growth of military expenditure to total GDP by percentage, which is then also subjected to a similar cross sectional comparison. Synthesized data suggests that Soviet and United States interventions, while sharing moderately related historical trends, do not share the same political and economic stresses revealed by this study. However, further research is needed before a definitive conclusion can be reached in relation to this topic.
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||MAI 52/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||American history, International law, Russian history|
|Keywords:||Afghanistan, Cold War, Hegemony, Overstretch|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be