Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Statutory Response to Court Security Concerns
by Weller, Charles E., Ph.D., University of Nevada, Reno, 2013, 169; 3608800
Abstract (Summary)

This paper proposes that legislation should be used to reduce the occurrence of courthouse violence. It begins with a review of what is known about the nature and costs of court targeted and non-targeted violence, drawing on published materials of the U.S. Marshals Service, the U.S. Secret Service, the Center for Judicial and Executive Security, and others. Previously unpublished materials are also reported. Court security efforts made in response to the violence are described. In the absence of empirical studies of the effectiveness of court security laws, the paper suggests that theories of criminology be used as guides for assessing the effectiveness of existing legislation and formulating new legislation. Criminological theories, including classical theory, rational choice theory, strain theory, and routine activity theory are discussed as models appropriate for use in evaluating court security legislation. Existing state and federal laws on paper terrorism, including false liens and U.C.C. filings; address confidentiality programs; and enhanced punishments for crimes against those involved in the judicial process are described, catalogued, and analyzed.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Richardon, James T., Leone, Matthew C.
Commitee: Muffler, John F., Pines, Zygmont A., Swensen, Steven K.
School: University of Nevada, Reno
Department: Judicial Studies
School Location: United States -- Nevada
Source: DAI-A 75/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Law, Criminology, Public policy
Keywords: Address confidentiality, Court security, Criminology, Paper terrorism, Rational choice, Targeted violence
Publication Number: 3608800
ISBN: 978-1-303-67229-3
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest