Recent curriculum recommendation call for mathematical argumentation to play a significantly greater role in U. S. mathematics instruction at all grade levels, including the elementary grades. To better understand how preservice elementary teachers (PTs) enrolled in a one-semester course emphasizing mathematical argumentation might become better prepared to implement this change, I interviewed five such PTs at two points in time, near the beginning of the course and shortly after they completed it. Both interviews focused on a problem set in which nine fictional elementary school students present arguments for their solutions to mathematical problems. Interviewees compared the arguments, decided which were convincing and which were not, and gave reasons for their choices. Using an interpretative, phenomenological approach, I analyzed their responses and found that they initially preferred arguments in which they perceived the arguer as knowing what to do, getting the correct answer, using a quick way to get it, showing how with numbers, and having the right attitude. In contrast, after they had completed the course, they focused on understanding the problem, finding answers that made sense, and explaining why with diagrams. They also viewed the arguer’s attitude as a more complex issue than they had at the beginning of the course. These and other findings suggest that current research on PTs’ approaches to mathematical justification may: (a) overemphasize the formal aspects of mathematical arguments and undervalue their substance, (b) overemphasize the role of verification and undervalue explanation, (c) be too far removed from PTs’ perspectives, and therefore (d) fail to accurately reflect significant progress in PTs’ understandings.
|Advisor:||Lannin, John K.|
|Commitee:||Arbaugh, Fran, Chval, Kathryn, Placier, Peggy, Tarr, James|
|School:||University of Missouri - Columbia|
|Department:||Learning, Teching, and Curriculum|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 75/03(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Mathematics education, Secondary education, Curriculum development|
|Keywords:||Curriculum recommendations, Mathematical argumentation, Preservice elementary teachers, Role of verification|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be