Alexander Scriabin’s late music has long fascinated music theorists by its unprecedented exploration of harmony. Accordingly, many analysts have attempted to capture Scriabin’s selfprofessed theoretical system, in which he states, “there is not one note unaccounted for.” However, no theorist has currently developed a comprehensive system of analysis for this music. While scholars have succeeded in relating members of the same set class through maximally invariant transposition, there are persistent issues in relating members of different set classes. The variety of conflicting methods of analysis attempting to relate members of different set classes suggests the following conclusion: there is no purely music-analytical theory that can explain Scriabin’s post-tonal compositional language.
However, new analytical approaches to Scriabin’s late music have been achieved by consulting his philosophical influences. The benefits of this diachronic approach to Scriabin’s late music are shown in the works of Richard Taruskin and Anna Gawboy, who analyze large passages of Scriabin’s music through maximally invariant transposition. This study extends this diachronic approach to develop a comprehensive system of analysis for relating different set classes in Scriabin’s late music. This study compares Scriabin’s most significant philosophical influences of Vladimir Solovyov, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche, Vyacheslav Ivanov, and Helena Blavatsky to uncover his underlying principle of unifying desire. This desire to create unity is then related Scriabin’s use of maximally invariant transposition, suggesting that each collection has a will to create unity based on its maximally invariant transpositions.
This theory of transpositional will is combined with Straus’s fuzzy transposition to create a comprehensive and hermeneutical system of analysis of Scriabin’s late music. My study finds the intervals of fuzzy transposition are related to the maximally invariant transpositions of the underlying collections, which represents their transpositional wills. Since different set classes can have different maximally invariant transpositions, the interval of transposition may exclusively satisfy the transposition will of one collection, while rejecting the transpositional will of the other collection. In turn, one can use this theory to completely analyze Scriabin’s late works through a series of unifying or competing transpositional wills, based on the similar and different maximally invariant transpositions of the collections in the pcset structure.
|Commitee:||Bazayev, Inessa, Dean, Paul, Petzet, John|
|School:||Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College|
|School Location:||United States -- Louisiana|
|Source:||DAI-A 75/03(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Invariance, Scriabin, alexander, Theosophy, Transposition|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be