Leaders in business, government, and education have sought to improve students’ ability to think critically. While research on professional learning communities (PLCs) suggests PLCs positively impact standardized test scores and teacher efficacy, there is little evidence of how PLCs using inquiry protocols influence teachers’ perceptions of instructional design for critical thinking and understanding students’ critical thinking. Demands for critical thinking instruction rather than test preparation, plus teachers’ misunderstanding of their students’ critical thinking, support the purpose for this case study. This study examined how PLCs using inquiry protocols influence teachers’ perceptions of instructional design for critical thinking and understanding students’ critical thinking. The theoretical framework for this study drew from several theories, its emphasis was on constructivism in PLCs’ use of inquiry protocols and critical thinking. PLC participants from an existing PLC agreed to join the study when asked during a PLC meeting. Eleven voluntary participants taught in 3 different grade levels and 8 subject areas. An inductive analysis of participant field notes, transcripts from PLC sessions, and group interviews indicated a divergence in participant understanding. Participants reflected either clarity or confusion in designing critical thinking projects and understanding students’ critical thinking. Implications for a positive social change develop as the PLC becomes a model for other classroom teachers seeking to teach beyond state testing mandates. This study addressed the district’s perceived need to advance instruction for critical thinking. PLC stakeholders seeking to maximize teacher clarity and minimize teacher confusion around critical thinking may use this study to identify actions to emulate as well as actions to eliminate.
|Commitee:||Henry, Patricia, Hoffman, Tammy|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Constructivism, Critical thinking, Instructional design, Professional learning communities, Protocols, Student understanding|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be