Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Charter School Authorizers and Programming: Searching for Best Practices in Michigan
by Filipczak, Kai, M.P.P., Georgetown University, 2013, 44; 1536410
Abstract (Summary)

Policymakers lack hard evidence that points toward specific educational best practices for charter schools at the school and authorizer level. This study uses proficiency rates and scale scores on the MEAP standardized exam to identify differences in the effectiveness of authorizers, school-level practices, and curricula among charter schools in Michigan. Following the work of Carlson, Lavery, and Witte (2012), I compare university-authorized charter schools to district-authorized charter schools but find little difference in proficiency rates or scale scores in individual grades or for white, black, and FRL-eligible subgroups. However, I am able to specifically identify several authorizers in Michigan as having below-average performance. I also find significant achievement gains associated with schools that use Core Knowledge and Montessori curricula, no positive achievement effects associated with arts-based curricula, and negative effects from attending a virtual charter school. Finally, I conduct a secondary analysis of charter school expulsions and conclude that it is unlikely that the achievement effects I observe are related to differences in the expulsion policies of charter schools.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Hinrichs, Peter L.
Commitee:
School: Georgetown University
Department: Public Policy & Policy Management
School Location: United States -- District of Columbia
Source: MAI 51/06M(E), Masters Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Education Policy, School administration
Keywords: Charter school, Michigan, Montesssori
Publication Number: 1536410
ISBN: 978-1-303-04728-2
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest