The world financial crisis that started in 2007 had a profound impact on the global apparel industry, but at the firm level, the impact of the financial crisis seemed to be unevenly distributed. Several luxury apparel companies, such as Louis Vuitton, achieved stable net sales whereas quite a few mass apparel companies, such as GAP, experienced significant drop of sales and profits. The study intends to systematically compare the financial performance of luxury apparel companies with mass apparel companies from 2008 to 2011 to see whether a general pattern of differentiated performance exists between these two types of companies as a result of their respective business models and the specific impact of the 2008 financial crisis.
MANOVA test was conducted based on six indices developed under the Dupont Strategic Profit Model (including annual growth rate of net sales, annual growth rate of cost of goods sold, gross margin percentage, net profit margin, asset turnover, and return on assets). Eight luxury apparel and eight mass apparel companies were selected for the purpose of the study.
The results showed that first, the overall financial performance between luxury apparel and mass apparel companies was statistically different from 2008 to 2011. Second, luxury apparel and mass apparel companies had different gross margin and asset turnover from 2008 to 2011. Third, there was no evidence showing that luxury apparel and mass apparel companies achieved different growth of net sales, growth of cost of goods sold and return on assets (ROA) from 2008 to 2011. Fourth, luxury apparel companies outperformed mass apparel companies starting in 2010 in terms of net profit margin, indicating more robust post-crisis recovery.
The results of the study confirmed the differentiated performance of selected luxury apparel and mass apparel companies' business models. The findings also suggested that luxury apparel companies achieved a more robust post-crisis recovery. Additionally, the results suggested that mass apparel companies should not enter the luxury apparel market because ROA of luxury apparel companies did not appear to be better than mass apparel companies.
|Commitee:||Mead, Art, Welters, Linda|
|School:||University of Rhode Island|
|Department:||Textiles, Fashion Merchandising, and Design|
|School Location:||United States -- Rhode Island|
|Source:||MAI 51/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Business administration, Finance, Hosiery and Sock Mills|
|Keywords:||Apparel industry, Financial crisis, Luxury apparel, Mass apparel|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be