This study investigates how social media is used to promote public engagement in science. Key questions this study attempts to answer are: • Is the public contributing science in these discussions? • Do users of social media sites remain on-topic within the post discussion? • Are the owners of social media sites responding to the users? • Should science communicators continue to use social media or are "traditional" websites more effective?
The study is based on a content analysis of 1326 comments within 50 posts on five science-oriented Facebook pages between May and June 2012. The five pages are the Discovery Channel, Science Friday, NASA, ScienceNOW, and the American Museum of Natural History. The 1326 comments were separated into eight categories designed to classify the scientific content and fundamental nature of each. It was found that only about five percent of the comments had any science content. Separate analyses for each of the five Facebook pages showed that the science content of comments ranged from a high of over 19 percent for Science Friday to a low of less than one percent for Discovery Channel. Half of all comments were directly related to the post topic, but contained no science content. Less than three percent of the comments were from the moderator of the Facebook page, indicating that the science community is rarely responding to others through social media. A comparison of traditional websites vs. social media sites found that users contributed only about one-quarter the numbers of comments via traditional websites as they did using social media.
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|Department:||Learning and Instruction|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||MAI 51/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social research, Communication, Web Studies|
|Keywords:||Facebook, Public engagement in science, Public understanding of science, Social media, Social networking sites, Web 2.0|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be