The federal mandate from the 1970s, Public Law 94-142, and subsequent updates to special education law, such as the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA) of 1997 and IDEA 2004, have been engaged to ensure that educators maintain high levels of compliance with special education policies and procedures. These and other high profile court cases have been indicators of challenges with procedural compliance with court-mandated practice within special education. Several cases from California are reviewed, each of which has led to significant changes to the educational procedure and practice. These changes often stemmed from lack of compliance within the school district to federal laws. This research sought to study the reported perceptions of school psychologists in the areas of (a) comprehensive procedure, (b) benefit of placement, and (c) school psychologists' satisfaction level with their district's procedure to determine special education eligibility. A survey developed by the researcher was administered to ascertain these perceptions as they relate to procedural fidelity. Their perceptions regarding a comprehensive procedure being in place at their district will be discussed. Results indicate that school psychologists perceive special education placement to be beneficial and they are satisfied with their district's current procedure.
Key Words: Special Education Placement, Special Education Eligibility, Procedural.
|Commitee:||Hagans, Kristi, Morrison, James|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|Department:||Advanced Studies in Education and Counseling|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 51/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education, Educational psychology, Special education|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be