The Open Educational Resources (OER) movement was started roughly ten years old (Wiley & Gurell, 2009). Since that time, thousands of resources have been produced. Though these resources have been used both for classroom development and for the autodidact, the development of OER was not without problems. Incompatibility between Creative Commons licenses has made revising and remixing two resources difficult, if not impossible (Linksvayer, 2006). Tools to help educators find appropriate educational resources have been necessary, but are still nascent. Educators' perceived quality issues have also hampered adoption (Wiley & Gurell, 2009). The result is that OER were only being minimally reused (Wiley, 2009). One possible reason observed for the limited reuse was the barrier of technology. Some OER was easier to view, revise and remix from a technical perspective than others.
Hilton, Wiley, Stein, and Johnson (2010) created the ALMS analysis framework to assess the technical openness of an OER. Although the ALMS framework allowed for an assessment of OER, no pilot instrument was reported in the Hilton et al. (2010) article. The framework has not been tested because there is no known rubric with which measurement can occur. Consequently, Hilton et al.'s framework needed to be further developed and tested against a range of open educational resources.
This dissertation examined the ALMS analysis, previously a conceptual framework only, in order to create a concrete framework with sufficient detail and documentation for comparisons to be made among OER. The rubric was further refined through a Delphi study consisting of experts in the field of OER (n=5). A sample of OER (n=27) by a small group of raters (n=4) to determine inter-rater reliability. Intra-class correlation indicated moderate agreement (ICC(2,1) =.655, df=376, 95% CI [.609, .699]). Findings suggested that the degree of technical difficulty in reusing OER can be measured in somewhat reliable manner. These findings may be insightful in developing policies and practices regarding OER development.
Keywords: OER, Open Educational Resources, ALMS, Delphi study
|Commitee:||Davies, Randall S., Gibbons, Andrew S., Graham, Charles R., West, Richard E.|
|School:||Brigham Young University|
|Department:||Instructional Psychology and Technology|
|School Location:||United States -- Utah|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||ALMS, Delphi study, OER, Open Education Resources|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be