With the pressure in education to develop a 21st century learner with higher-level thinking skills, many educators connected previous state curriculum to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Missouri's Department of Education experts paired the previous state's curriculum known as the Missouri Grade Level Expectations (MO GLEs) with a corresponding CCSS based on Webb's depth-of-knowledge model in a document commonly referred to as the Missouri Crosswalk. This quantitative content analysis study compared the MO GLEs and CCSS by quantifying the language using an adapted and revised Bloom's taxonomy framework. This study tested for a cognitive difference in means and for a possible relationship between the two documents using the Missouri Crosswalk in each grade level from 1-5 in the areas of English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics (MA). This study revealed no overall difference in means between the MO GLEs and the CCSS within the content areas of ELA and MA, grades 1-5. Although the results seemed as though CCSS did not offer more higher-level thinking opportunities than the MO GLEs, the researcher noticed a trend in the amount of objectives assigned in each cognitive category. In a further analysis that divided the objectives into higher-level and lower-level thinking, the results showed CCSS generally had more higher-level thinking opportunities than the MO GLEs. The contradicting results showed the importance of closely analyzing the two documents in order to adjust instruction.
This study also revealed no cognitive relationship between the paired CCSS and MO GLEs aligned in the Missouri Crosswalk for all grades in both ELA and MA with the exception of fifth grade ELA. The structural difference in the ELA and MA crosswalk prompted an investigation of the objectives labeled "direct alignment" found only in the ELA crosswalk. The result showed no relationship between the higher-level thinking skills in the ELA GLE and the "direct" paired CCSS in all grade levels except fourth grade. Generally speaking, when adjusting instruction based on the objectives labeled "direct", only grade 4 ELA teachers may find the Missouri Crosswalk helpful since it was the only grade level to show a cognitive relationship.
|Commitee:||Leavitt, Linda, Wisdom, Sherrie|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Common Core State Standards (CCSS), Missouri Grade Level Expectations (MO GLEs), Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Framework|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be