Auction frauds develop in online auctions as online auction platforms expand in use. Shill bidding is one of the most prevalent forms of auction frauds that violate the integrity of online auctions. A shill is a person who pretends to be a legitimate buyer and feigns enthusiasm for an auctioned item by bidding up the auction price. Although the punishment for auction fraud could be severe (e.g., several years in prison with fines), shill bidding is still very popular. One primary reason is the lack of effective shill detection techniques in current online auction systems. Shill inference in online auctions is a difficult problem due to the characteristic of concealment of shill bidding activities and the anonymous nature of online applications. Shill bidding usually occurs without leaving obvious direct physical evidence, thus it cannot be easily noticed by the victims. In addition, because online auction users do not deal with each other face to face, acquired “hints” or evidence of shilling behavior generally involves uncertainty, thus making the investigation even more challenging.
We propose to design an automated and effective approach to infer shills in online auction systems. To assist the investigation, we conducted an empirical study on the relationship between final auction price and shill bidding activity. Based on a predicted price, the actual price can help distinguish trustworthy auctions from likely shill-infected auctions. To infer exact shills, we propose to formalize various auction-level indicators and bid-level indicators that support shill bidding as well as innocent bidding. Since each indicator can involve uncertainty, we employ a formal reasoning technique, Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory, to model the uncertainties associated with different indicators that pertain to varied aspects of an auction. This allows us to explicitly represent the uncertainties and combine knowledge from different sources to produce an aggregated assessment of trustworthiness.
|Advisor:||Shatz, Sol M.|
|Commitee:||Di Eugenio, Barbara, Johnson, Andy, Nelson, Peter, Shatz, Sol M., Xu, Haiping|
|School:||University of Illinois at Chicago|
|School Location:||United States -- Illinois|
|Source:||DAI-B 74/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Commerce-Business, Computer science|
|Keywords:||Auction fraud, Automated inference, Online auctions, Shill bidding|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be