The Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee (ISDC) is a unique governmental body whose responsibilities are directed by both the executive and legislative branches. But this was not always the case. Prior to 2008, the ISDC remained largely an obscure organization unknown to anyone outside of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) or the agency personnel charged with handling suspension and debarment matters. This all changed as a result of 2008 legislation requiring the ISDC to designate an agency to take the lead on a suspension or debarment action where more than one agency had an interest, and to also report annually to Congress on suspension and debarment issues. These responsibilities, while new, were years in the making and the result of several legislative efforts since 2002 that had alternatively died in committee or been objected to by OMB.
This thesis reviews the historical foundation for a uniform suspension and debarment system dating back to the 1960s and leading up to the creation of the ISDC in 1986. This thesis also explores how the ISDC's influence grew to include both nonprocurement and procurement suspension and debarment matters, as well as how a lead agency is designated for a suspension or debarment action. Special attention is also given to assessing the ISDC's success in performing its 2008 statutory responsibilities, including the coordinating and staffing difficulties that prevented the ISDC from timely meeting its reporting obligation to Congress. Also analyzed is recent guidance from OMB directing greater executive agency participation in the ISDC, as well as current appropriations and contingency contracting initiatives by Congress that could potentially complicate the ISDC's coordinating functions.
This thesis concludes with several recommendations the ISDC should take to improve its functioning, enhance its credibility, and restructure its leadership and mission. Specifically, the ISDC should continue its efforts to fully unify nonprocurement and procurement suspension and debarment practices; establish formal guidelines by which lead agencies are selected; revitalize the ISDC website with fully accessible suspension and debarment content; address the need for permanent staffing; and assess the selection and priorities of future leaders of the ISDC. Doing so will better enable the ISDC to remain at the forefront of the suspension and debarment field.
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Government Procurement Law|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 51/04M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Law, Public policy|
|Keywords:||Committee, Debarment, ISDC, Interagency, Nonprocurement, Suspension|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be