This study focused on the aspect of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) that require the inclusion of all limited English proficient (LEP) students in testing situations, simultaneously making an effort to close the achievement gap. NCLB indicates that each state is to assess students in a language and form that facilitates an accurate understanding of what LEP students know and can do. Using a representative sample of third grade students from a linguistically diverse school district in Virginia, this study was conducted to see if modified-English translation accommodations assist LEP students to demonstrate their mathematics content knowledge, concurrently eliminating language barriers. In Virginia, mandatory state assessments are administered in English and LEP students often encounter testing difficulties due to a lack of English proficiency. Low scores on these assessments result in LEP students being placed in inappropriate academic tracks, being retained an additional school year, and being offered limited academic opportunities, all resulting in a lack of confidence. In some cases, LEP students are unable to graduate.
This study aimed to use an experimental mixed design to determine whether third grade LEP students perform better on mathematics assessments that are linguistically modified and translated into Spanish. The findings of this study suggested modified-English, translation accommodations improve LEP 1 & 2 students mathematics content knowledge. The modified-English, translation accommodation did not significantly improve LEP 3 & 4 student mathematics test scores. This indicated as a student's English proficiency improves, the modified-English, translation accommodation is not necessary. This study was intended to provide policy makers insight into whether modified-English translation would be considered a viable accommodation for the LEP population.
|Advisor:||Sherrill, Kelly A.|
|Commitee:||Swayze, Susan, Weiss, Brandi A.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Educational Administration and Policy Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Education Policy, School administration|
|Keywords:||English proficiency, Limited English proficiency, Testing accommodations|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be