Site level administrators make decisions during the course of a day that have ethical dimensions that challenge their personal values and ethics. This study examined the extent to which particular factors would affect principals' and vice principals' judgments of the ethicality of sanctions given a teacher who had been sending sexually explicit messages to a recent graduate (i.e., sexting). In an on-line survey, participants (N = 326) provided demographic information, completed a measure (Rammstadt & John, 2007) of the two personality traits of conscientiousness and openness to experience, and then read one of 12 versions of a vignette describing a sexting incident with a teacher. The essential elements of the vignette were the same across conditions, but varied by (a) offender gender, (b) offender race or ethnicity (African American, Hispanic, or White, non-Hispanic), and (c) the disposition of the situation (more lenient versus more strict sanction for the offender). Participants then rated the ethicality of the disposition using a measure by McMahon and Harvey (2007). Finally, they were asked to describe what action they would have taken in this circumstance.
Neither conscientiousness nor openness to experience predicted participant responses. They did, though, perceive the stricter disposition as more ethical. As well, there was a gender interaction so that the more severe disposition was rated as more ethical for a male offender. From the qualitative responses participants provided, it was clear that nearly two-thirds would have turned the situation over to the district office to handle. The implications of those findings are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.
Key Terms-social justice, decision-making, heuristics, ethics, and sexting.
|Commitee:||Denham, Robert, Mitchell, Ross|
|School:||University of Redlands|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Ethics, Educational leadership, School administration|
|Keywords:||Decision-making, Ethics, Gender, Heuristics, Principals, Race, Sexting, Social justice|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be