A heavy research emphasis on the discretionary decision-making actions by police has led researchers to conduct a substantial amount of work regarding the individual, situational, organizational, and neighborhood influences on police behavior. The culmination of all this work results in one main conclusion—the majority of findings regarding the causes of police behavior are mixed. Further, current models of police behavior account for only a small amount of the variation.
In an effort to expand existing knowledge on police decision-making behavior, this research utilized the Project on Policing Neighborhoods (POPN) observational data to conduct two primary analyses of dispute resolution encounters. First, a content analysis of the narrative debriefings of dispute resolution encounters was completed to develop overall themes of decision-making and account for both the depth and breadth of individual officer search for information in deciding on an outcome. Second, a structural model (based on coded observational data) of an arrest outcome in dispute resolution encounters was compared to a process model (based on the narrative data) of the arrest decision.
The content analysis revealed that officers utilize working rules (or, decision making shortcuts) and, further, that the influence of the working rule on decision making behavior is mediated by specific cognitive frameworks. The content analysis also revealed that officers, on average, used less than half of the information that was available to them prior to making a decision.
The comparison of the structural model (estimated using logistic regression) and the process model revealed that both models do quite well in predicting all dispositions. However, overall performance is driven by the fact that arrest is a rare occurrence. When it comes to predicting arrest, the process model performs better in both sites. Much of the information that is important to officers in an arrest decision is included in the process model but is rendered statistically insignificant in the structural model. That is because many of the informational inputs to which officers attend are important but rarely occur and, thus, would not be expected to be statistically significant. Thus, freed from any interpretation regarding statistical significance (and focusing instead on substantive significance), the process model seems to represent a more accurate depiction of the complex nature of the police decision-making.
|Advisor:||Worden, Robert E.|
|Commitee:||Bayley, David, McLean, Sarah, Terrill, William, Worden, Alissa|
|School:||State University of New York at Albany|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Arrest decision, Decision-making, Police discretion, Process model, Working rules|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be