In the chronology of writing process instruction, the use of response groups is not new. Research on using response groups as a predictable structure in writing classes focuses mostly on framework, control, and talk within the groups and the role of response on writers' revision work. There have been few studies that looked at response as a flexible tool used by student writers, in general and elementary aged writers, in particular. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap, by exploring the understandings of response constructed by student writers and the meanings they made of response as a tool to support their writing work. For my research, I defined response as a space for writers to seek feedback from peers on their writing.
Using a qualitative case study framework and constant comparative analysis, I examined how fifth-grade writers constructed understandings of response throughout the writing process. The context for the study was an established writing workshop, through which I also examined the role that responsive teaching played in supporting student writers' constructed understanding of response. Based on my analyses of the student writers' response session transcripts and reflective conversations with the case response group and classroom teacher, I found that these young writers used response in flexible ways to support self-identified needs throughout their writing process, as they developed their understandings of the reciprocal nature of reading and writing. The study also offers implications for expanding the current writing process models to include response and the use of response groups to develop readers as meaning makers and broaden the instructional base of reading and writing.
|Commitee:||Bryan, Michelle L., Laman, Tasha, Oglan, Victoria, Wood Ray, Katie|
|School:||University of South Carolina|
|Department:||Language and Literacy|
|School Location:||United States -- South Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Language arts, Elementary education|
|Keywords:||Peer response, Response groups, Writing workshop|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be