Systems thinking (ST) is the philosophical underpinning for the field of family therapy (FT). This notion of understanding the whole comprised of parts has a long history, some suggest dating back to Descartes and Aristotle. A number of influential men—Darwin, Wiener, Bertalanffy, Bateson, Erickson, and Foucault—recorded their interpretation of ST, which became the basis for relational theories and practices. Commonly used in clinical settings, family therapists have been applying this knowledge to create change in people’s lives. However, the principles were meant to be universal and have been applicable in other contexts. A growing number of trained FTs use their teambuilding expertise in business settings. Books, articles, workshops, and conferences have been addressing this topic and trying to communicate its prevalence for over 20 years. Yet, faculty members seldom delve into organizational change, and the literature has been lacking in numerous areas, except for what is customary for FTs to do with their training: Work with families.
The researcher thoroughly investigated six seasoned doctoral graduates who have taken their systemic training and applied it toward successful programs, consultations, and management of diverse professionals in varied businesses. The grand tour question was: How have seasoned family therapy doctoral graduates utilized their systemic training in human service team-based organizations? A grounded theory approach using a constant comparative method of analysis uncovered multifaceted ways their understanding has been employed. The findings indicated systemic tridimensional levels: (a) Three large categories (i.e., Learning Stage of ST Principles, Expansion Stage for Connecting ST Principles, and Transition and Execution Stage for Utilizing ST Principles), (b) eight process concepts, and (c) 22 constructs. The participants have broadened and assimilated their lifetime learning and training recursively in every realm, which transformed into a constant state of beingness. This grander synthesis process created the expertise and opportunities to practice outside therapeutic settings into different organizations and beyond as macro-level Change Agents. Implications for training, practice, and research within the FT field, various systemic disciplines, and other business professional contexts have been identified.
|Advisor:||Boyd, Tommie V.|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-B 74/04(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Management, Individual & family studies, Systems science|
|Keywords:||Aristotle, Cybernetics, Doctoral graduates, Family therapy, Human service organizations, Leadership, Systems thinking, Team building|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be