The amount of processing difficulty a reader has in integrating a new word into a sentence is a function of the degree to which information about that word has been activated by context, prior to that word being encountered. Some computational models of language comprehension, like the surprisal models (Hale, 2001; Levy 2008), have attempted to capture the relationship between how activated information associated with a target word is, prior to its being encountered, and how easy or hard that target word will be to integrate into a sentence representation, by assuming that the activation of an about-to-be-encountered word is completely determined by how predictable it is given a sentence context. In this dissertation, I tested the claims of the probability-only account by showing that word predictability did not entirely determine the degree of processing difficulty. I present three results that the probability-only account cannot explain. The first result is that the costs of integrating a target word into a context sentence were not exclusively predicted by its conditional probability. The degree to which target words were semantically similar to other possible words for the same context also influenced the ease or difficulty of integrating that word into a sentence (Chapter 3). Second, facilitation based on semantic similarity emerged only when contexts weakly constrained the properties of possible word choices (Chapter 4). Third, the effect of semantic similarity on word integration was modulated by whether or not verbs imposed early and highly selective constraints on the activation of features associated with instrument participant roles (Chapter 5). All of these results indicate that the activation of semantic concepts or features from context is not entirely reflected in word predictabilities. In contrast to probability-only accounts, I argue that how easy or hard it is to integrate a word into a sentence is best understood in terms of the activation of representations across word and semantic feature levels.
|Advisor:||Mauner, Gail, Roland, Douglas|
|Commitee:||Colder, Craig, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Sawusch, James R.|
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-B 74/02(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Linguistics, Cognitive psychology|
|Keywords:||Anticipation, Constraint, Predictability, Semantic similarity, Sentence procesing, Verb participant role information|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be