Many school districts are in need of a successful plan of action for school district referendums. The purpose of this descriptive study was to determine the perceived effectiveness between factors and strategies surrounding referendums and the passage of those measures meant to improve school funding and facilities. The findings from Johnson and Ingle (2008) and Holt et al. (2006) were used to guide this study. Three questions were posed: What do superintendents identify as strategies to use as prescriptive plans for successful school referendums? What existing factors do superintendents identify that lead to success of school referendums? What existing factors do superintendents identify that lead to failure of school referendums? A survey was sent to 134 school superintendents in Missouri who attempted to pass referendums between November 2009 and November 2011. The survey was composed primarily of questions utilizing a Likert scale. Superintendents were to respond to statements based on their perceived influence in their referendums. The results indicated that nine strategies were influential based upon the mode and p value scores. Three of the most influential strategies based upon the respondent scores included: Campaign focused on the benefits to the children, influential people participated on the steering committee, and focus on getting ‘yes’ voters to the polls. The most influential factors included: Trust in the superintendent and school board, and board support was unanimous. Factors that were viewed to be detrimental included: Increased tax burden, organized opposition, and failure to get enough of the parent vote.
|Commitee:||Grover, Kathy, Reid, Terry|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 74/01(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education finance, School administration|
|Keywords:||Facilities, Public education, Referendums, School funding|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be