Social scientists and researchers frequently use latent variable models to analyze the relationships between observed variables and latent variables representing the hypothesized constructs. The population, or true, model is not always known, resulting in a degree of misspecification in the relationships between variables in the model. Therefore, model- and item-fit statistics have been developed in order to provide evidence for the validity of a specific latent variable model.
Conditions for mathematical equivalence between two popular latent variable modeling methods, confirmatory factors analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT), have been established, availing the researcher and practitioner of a variety of model- and item-fit indices. This dissertation employs a simulation design to examine the behavior of three model-fit indices (χ2/df, RMSEA, and GDDM) and three item-fit indices (S-χ 2, Modification Index, Wald Test) under various conditions of model misspecification and test design conditions. The results of this study show the empirically-derived cut points to out-perform the theoretical and suggested cut points when true models are estimated; these cut points are employed in subsequent analysis of misspecified models. In addition to examining the statistical power of each fit index to correctly reject the misspecified models, recommendations are made for the use of each fit statistic according to the model misspecification and test design conditions manipulated in the simulation study. Analysis of a real data set is provided as an illustration.
|Advisor:||Rupp, Andre A.|
|Commitee:||Croninger, Robert G., Hancock, Gregory R., Lissitz, Robert W., Mislevy, Robert J.|
|School:||University of Maryland, College Park|
|Department:||Measurement, Statistics and Evaluation|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational evaluation, Statistics|
|Keywords:||Confirmatory factor analysis, Item fit, Model equivalence, Model fit, Multidimensional item response theory|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be