This study explored the experiences and perceptions of individuals from two different groups and two different cultures about the topic of Advance Directives (AD) during clinical encounters. Framed by end-of-life discussions, physician-patient relationship scholarship and using grounded theory, physicians and patients from the United States (US) and Ghana (GH) were asked to share conversations about end-of-life. To examine the cultural framework about the topic, interviews (one-on-one) were conducted with US (n = 45) and GH (n = 45) patients, and US (n = 30) and GH (n = 30) physicians about AD discussions. Consistent with grounded theory approach and conceptual framework on AD, the data was analyzed by open, initial, axial and selective coding into concepts and categories. Subsequently, theory development, constant comparative procedure and the basic social processes from data analysis emerged until saturation. Results from the sample participants showed differences in communication about the topic by individualist and collectivist societies. However, there were similarities between Caucasian Americans and Ghanaians who have assimilated in the US on one hand and African Americans and Ghanaians living in Ghana on the other. This study also identified intervening factors explaining the challenges and strengths as well as contextual reasons such as the role of gender, religion and concept of disease in making decisions about AD. Consequently, the theoretical model illustrates the relationship in communicating AD between the groups and countries with suggestions on improving awareness (GH) and completion rates (US).
Keywords: Advance Directive; End-of-life decision making; Grounded theory; Individualist & Collectivist society; Physician-patient relationship.
|Advisor:||Feeley, Thomas H.|
|Commitee:||Frank, Mark, Griswold, Kimberly|
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Cultural Resources Management, Communication, Health care management|
|Keywords:||Advance directive, End-of-life decision making, Ghana, Grounded theory, Individualist & collectivist society, Physician-patient relationship, United States|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be