It is generally accepted that Working Memory is limited in capacity. However, there has been substantial debate over whether this limit in capacity is best described as a finite limit on the number of items that can be stored or a decline in the precision of memory as the number of memoranda increases. In an attempt to resolve this debate, ten mathematical models that incorporate the above assumptions were fit to the data from six experiments, encompassing 155 participants, using Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Measures of fit derived from the maximized likelihoods were used to compare the two descriptions of capacity. Overall, Working-Memory Capacity seems to be more accurately described as a limit on the number of items that can be held in memory.
|School:||University of Missouri - Columbia|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||MAI 51/01M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be