This study is a comparison of the descriptive tagging practices among library, archive, and museum professionals using an inter-indexing consistency approach. The first purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the similarities and differences among professional groups when assigning descriptive tags to a wide variety of objects that may be found in any one or all three types of institutions (libraries, archives, and museums). Descriptive practices among information professionals were determined using measures of inter-indexer terminological consistency to compare frequencies in descriptive tagging outcomes. The second purpose of this study was to compare the descriptive practices of these three different groups of information professionals to different object types typically found within the library, archive, or museum environment. The number of tags applied per object type and professional group was measured via a two-way analysis of variance.
The objectives were to: (1) determine if there was a significant difference in the number of tags assigned to the four different object types by the three groups of information professionals; (2) determine if there was a significant difference in the number of exact matched tags among professional groups when describing the four object types, and; (3) determine if there was a significant difference among information professionals in the percentage of matched tags per object type.
Findings from this study indicate while there are few differences in depth of indexing per object type among professional groups, various levels of description were applied to the four different object types. Levels of description were derived from: (1) the three dimensional or physical media pictured; (2) the digital surrogate; (3) the objects aboutness ; (4) the technique and materials used to make the physical object, and; (5) written text. Data analysis also indicates there was a significant difference between means in the total number of descriptive tags and in the number of exact matched primary tags applied per object type. As such, information retrieval within the online environment could be improved if there was better quality control in the application of subject access points among information professionals across the library, archive, and museum environments.
|Advisor:||Hastings, Samantha K., Williams, Robert V.|
|Commitee:||Koverman, Jill, Lewis, Elise, Marshall, Jennifer|
|School:||University of South Carolina|
|Department:||Libary & Information Science|
|School Location:||United States -- South Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Library science, Information science, Museum studies|
|Keywords:||Archive professionals, Information representation, Inter-indexing consistency, Library professionals, Museum professionals, Tagging|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be