Nursing education faces many challenges such as faculty shortages, inadequate clinical site placements, the inability to accept qualified students because of limited resources, and how to effectively educate students who are tech savvy, confident, highly motivated yet have differing needs from previous generations. This study sought to explore how nurse educators can engage students when traditional teaching methods such as lecture may not work. The use of simulation, a method where students perform nursing skills on interactive mannequins, may provide significant insights into this issue. Yet there is limited research on this relatively new method. This study evaluates two distinct groups of students in the clinical environment and outcomes produced from two different methods of learning based on skill performance, competency, and confidence perception. A total of 56 senior level nursing students, 23 traditional group and 33 simulated guided, were evaluated. Quantitative and qualitative data collection included surveys (NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning), questionnaires, and a researcher developed measurement tool. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.19 statistical software. Findings indicate that although there were small differences seen between the groups, the use of simulation as a method of teaching along with traditional practices are beneficial in taking a learner centered approach in educating today's nursing student.
|Commitee:||DiStefano, Christine, Duffy, Nancy, Jeffries, Rhonda|
|School:||University of South Carolina|
|Department:||Curriculum and Instruction|
|School Location:||United States -- South Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational evaluation, Health education, Curriculum development|
|Keywords:||Confidence, Newborn, Nursing education, Satisfaction, Simulation, Student learning, Teaching methodologies, Vital sign assessment|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be