Juvenile drug use is a persistent problem that has negative effects not just the academic performance of students but also increases the likelihood of these students failing in life. Consequently, school officials in the United States have undertaken efforts to address this problem through the implementation of drug prevention programs such as Drug Abuse Resistance Education ( DARE) and Substance Abuse for Educators (SAFE) programs. The instrument was sent to 276 middle school students, 307 elementary students, but only 37 K-8 school administrators responded and were examined regarding these programs and analyzed how the years of experience and knowledge of drug education policy affects their perceptions of these programs. The study investigated perceptions of these school administrators on the implementation of random drug testing as a means to combat the problem of juvenile drug use. The results of the regression analysis indicated that the years of experience had a significant effect on the perceptions of the school administrators on the DARE but not on the SAFE program. The results of the regression analysis also indicated that the knowledge of drug education policy has no significant effect on the perception of the DARE and SAFE programs. Descriptive analysis revealed that these school administrators find the current used program to be effective and the response to implementing random drug testing in schools was not positive. The perception of the school officials are instrumental in shaping drug policy in the education sector and can affect the formulation of policies to address the problems created by juvenile drug use.
|School:||University of Phoenix|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Management, Health education, Organizational behavior|
|Keywords:||Drug policy, Drug testing, Leadership, Moustakas, Clark E., Perception, Program implementation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be